Do Democrats think before speaking?

I know that Republicans rarely do; the Democrats seem to follow suit. In today’s Washington Post, in “Assessing Sarah Palin”, Democratic pollster Douglas E. Schoen offers the following brilliance (Read the whole piece for his complete thoughts and the opinions of others, including a couple of grade-A morons.):

By passing up obviously qualified candidates such as Joe Lieberman and former Pennsylvania governor Tom Ridge, who offered at least the possibility of bipartisanship and a broader range of experience and background than Palin, McCain has missed a critical opportunity to expand the reach of a party whose base has been narrowing steadily since 2004.

Time for some amateur deconstruction.

1. How, precisely, define we “qualified” here? Being anathema to the party’s socially conservative base, McCain’s relationship wherewith has been quite shaky at times? Unrepentantly and shamelessly promoting endless war in the Middle East and a one-sided policy respecting that volatile region? Having served as Secretary of a Cabinet department that should not exist and serves little more than further to expand the Leviathan and to embarrass our nation? (Eww, Ridge also sits on the board of Home Depot!)

2. Yes, Ridge is socially moderate-to-liberal, but he hardly offers “bipartisanship”; well, anyway, I’m not sure that anyone from the Bush administration really can. I could be mistaken.

3. The Democrats, of course, care much more about preventing their base from narrowing. Also, as I, and others, have argued, Palin does help to expand the party’s — or at least McCain’s — reach: She may be too conservative to make serious inroads with the Hillarycrats, but she certainly offers some appeal; she has a pretty moderate record on gay rights; she’s an undeniable outsider (for better as much as for worse); and, apparently, she has some Buchanan/Paul sympathies. She probably will fail to draw many from that wing, but considering that neither Baldwin nor Barr is perfect enough, she might shore up a bit of support from the Old Right/traditionalist wing, if she can prove that she still holds these positions. I almost should not be surprised if Buchanan eventually caves and throws his support behind the “bellicose, red-faced, angry guy”. Almost.

As John notes, I have expressed enthusiasm for the McCain-Palin ticket; not enough to sway my vote to them, but enough for me less to fear a McCain presidency. I wish not to go over-board on the matter, so, at least for now, until something major would happen, expect only one more post from me on the matter — if I remember what final point I wanted to make as I lay in bed last night, drifting into the realm of dreams.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: